The Iranian nuclear deal. Straight Europeans in their boots

(B2) Despite the backlash from the Trump administration, the Europeans have managed to keep their unity on the Iranian nuclear issue. A tour de force worth seeing

The E3 (JY Le Drian, H. Maas, B. Johnson) with Iranian Minister Javad Zarif and Federica Mogherini in Brussels in May 2018 (credit: EU – B2 Archives)

Venus versus Mars

To say that the Europeans are weak or cannot agree is such a regular refrain that we sometimes forget to highlight the opposite: when the Europeans are in agreement. They have thus defeated (in part) Donald Trump's desire to wipe the slate clean of the past and in particular the agreement concluded on Iranian nuclear power (in July 2015) by the Obama administration.

Huge American pressure

Under the Trump I administration, however, the United States has not let go for almost four years: pressure on the Allies, public vilification, legal denunciation of the agreement, partial reinstatement of sanctions, extraterritorial effect, threats against the Allies , then held hostage by the United Nations Security Council, etc. We cannot say that Washington has always done with finesse and delicacy.

The high risk of cracks

Normally, this pressure should have left the Iran deal in the dust. The agreement has certainly wavered, dangerously. It has been threatened on several occasions to be, if not broken up, at least abandoned. But his other participants held firm. We could also have predicted splits between the Europeans, especially between a United Kingdom which took the door of the Union and the other members, or between a France holding a tough position vis-à-vis Tehran, more close to the US position and Berlin. It has not happened.

Unity despite everything

The E3 (as they are called) have remained united, despite the shades of opinion that characterize them, multiplying joint statements. With one voice, they multiplied the declarations against the American maneuvers to torpedo the agreement. They have set up a structure intended to circumvent the American sanctions: Instex is not super efficient but it works. And above all, as one man, they denied any validity of the last US attempt to use a clause of the agreement (known as 'snapback') aimed at automatically reinstating sanctions after exiting the agreement. Followed in this by the entire UN Security Council - with one exception: the Rep. Dominican (read: Iran. The US is pushing for the reinstatement of sanctions. Gaping gap with the Europeans).

“We have to hold out until the elections,” a senior European diplomat whispered to me between his teeth. No matter the cost

The humiliation of his friends does not help in diplomacy

In the end, in this standoff, contrary to what one might have thought, it was not Mars who won, but the European Venus (read: JCPOA. The New US Offensive to Destroy the Iran Nuclear Deal Hits a Wall). The Trump administration, in its rush to get the 'skin' of the Iranians, made a strategic and tactical mistake. By wanting to humiliate their adversaries — the Iranians — they lumped together their natural partners and allies — the Europeans — like their other international partners. By wanting to go too fast, they tripped over the carpet (1). This whereas Europeans and Americans are rather on the same line on the bottom (2).

A small slap to the American hyperpower

The slap received by the Americans at the United Nations Security Council in August will remain in diplomatic memories. It does not lead, in fact, to a lowering of an indisputable power. But she brings a hell of a temper. If united, Europeans, Chinese and Russians can reduce American weight.

Will this unnatural alliance happen again? Why not. In any case, an emblematic subject to follow closely without prejudice...

(Nicolas Gros-Verheyde)

  1. If the US had remained in the agreement, they could trigger this clause, due to Iran's non-compliance with certain provisions of the agreement and were almost guaranteed to obtain the reinstatement of sanctions within the Security Council. United Nations. The only US veto then prevented the continuation of the lifting of sanctions. A " incomprehensible tactical error according to diplomats.
  2. Evidenced by the Europeans' refusal to reopen the arms embargo for Iran, unlike Russia and China. (read : The heavy weapons embargo on Iran is lifted. Not for Europeans. And even less for the USA)

Nicolas Gros Verheyde

Chief editor of the B2 site. Graduated in European law from the University of Paris I Pantheon Sorbonne and listener to the 65th session of the IHEDN (Institut des Hautes Etudes de la Défense Nationale. Journalist since 1989, founded B2 - Bruxelles2 in 2008. EU/NATO correspondent in Brussels for Sud-Ouest (previously West-France and France-Soir).

Privacy Preferences Center

Necessary

Advertising

Analytics

Other